In identifying and eliminating various problems, errors in architecture, design, for example, huge classes, duplication of elements. TestDriven. The main principle is testing of certain modules of the source code, their sets. This approach allows you to make sure that the functioning of the new product meets the requirements and does not negatively affect the functionality.
For mium-siz projects, it is acceptable to resort to manual
Code refactoring But a more reliable way is to use special tools that can automate the analysis process. Most of them can be found on the Internet. For your reference, we offer several effective options: Stepsize. Using this program, you can mom database track technical debt, elements that ne refactoring, and mark problem areas. Glean – Helps in implementing various functionality (for example, extracting JSX into other components, including this extension in conditions, etc.).Just Code.
The tool fits seamlessly into the workflow
Ss it has quick recommendations, a program for using unit tests, and the ability to generate code. Additionally, there is navigation, a function for this will allow the original searching for code, its templates, and the ability to decompile. SonaLint – identifies and displays existing errors, security vulnerabilities, and offers specific instructions for eliminating them before the project is publish.
What is the danger of code refactoring?
The procure involves intervention in the workflow. Trying to simplify it as much as possible, you can screw up significantly. A carelessly perform powder data refactoring can suspend work on the project for a long time. It is not recommend to resort to the procure from time to time. The desire to fix everything now will lead to the developer getting stuck for a long time. It is better to refactor systematically, little by little. There are cases when code refactoring is us to sabotage the implementation of new products.